MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094713197 · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/7/315

Effects of crosslinker fraction in polymer gel dosimeters using FT Raman spectroscopy

2001· article· en· W2094713197 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Jirasek, Cheryl Duzenli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsDosimeterMonomerPolymerDosimetryMaterials scienceIrradiationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Raman spectroscopyPolyacrylamideRadiochemistryChemistryPolymer chemistryNuclear medicineChromatographyOpticsComposite materialNuclear physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation-induced chemical changes in polyacrylamide gels (PAGs) used in 3D radiation dosimetry have been studied using Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy. Consumption of monomer and crosslinker were characterized for polymer gel dosimeters with initial fraction of crosslinker (%C) varying from to 100%. Results indicate that the rate of monomer/crosslinker consumption is highly nonlinear over %C. This indicates that maximum polymer gel dosimeter sensitivity (i.e. slope of the monomer consumption curves) is dependent not only on initial %C but also on dose range. For low-dose regions (<5 Gy) 30%C PAGs are the most sensitive dosimeters, their maximum sensitivity being a factor of 1.8 times greater than 50%C PAGs. In mid-dose range (S-15 Gy), however, 50%C PAGs are the most sensitive dosimeters, being potentially a factor of 1.3 more sensitive than any other PAG studied. In high-dose regions (> 15 Gy) 70%C PAGs are at least 1.5 times more sensitive than any other PAG studied. A qualitative model is presented which helps to explain the variation in overall monomer consumption rate as a function of initial %C. The variation in the shapes (i.e. mathematical course) of the consumption curves for different %C PAGs is, in part, qualitatively explained by consideration of the average number of monomer to crosslinker molecules available for reaction in each PAG as it is irradiated to higher doses. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of an existing polymer network on the subsequent monomer consumption rate in a 50%C PAG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207