Control of cardiac pyruvate dehydrogenase activity in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α transgenic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pyruvate dehydrogenase enzyme complex (PDC) is rate limiting for glucose oxidation in the heart. Inhibition of PDC by end-product feedback and phosphorylation by pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) operate in concert to inhibit PDC activity. Because the transcriptional regulator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha increases PDK expression in some tissues, we examined what role PPAR-alpha has in regulating glucose oxidation in hearts from mice overexpressing PPAR-alpha (MHC-PPAR-alpha mice). Glucose oxidation rates were decreased in isolated working hearts from MHC-PPAR-alpha mice compared with wild-type littermates (428 +/- 113 vs. 771 +/- 63 nmol x g dry weight-1x min-1, respectively), which was accompanied by a parallel increase in fatty acid oxidation. However, there was no difference in PDC activity between MHC-PPAR-alpha and wild-type animals, even though the expression of the PDK isoform PDK1 was increased in MHC-PPAR-alpha mice. Glucose oxidation rates in both MHC-PPAR-alpha and wild-type mouse hearts were decreased after 48-h fasting (which increases PPAR-alpha expression) or by treatment of mice with the PPAR-alpha agonist WY-14,643 for 1 wk. Despite this, PDC activity in both animal groups was not altered. Taken together, these data suggest that glucose oxidation rates in the heart can be dramatically altered independent of PDK phosphorylation and inhibition of PDC by PDK. It also suggests that PPAR-alpha activation decreases glucose oxidation in hearts mainly by decreasing the flux of pyruvate through PDC due to negative feedback of PDC by fatty acid oxidation reaction products rather than by the phosphorylated state of the PDC complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".