MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094777456 · doi:10.1021/ma001336w

A Capping Method for Nitrogen Anion Initiated Living Anionic Polymerization for Synthesizing Alkyl Methacrylate Macromonomers

2001· article· en· W2094777456 on OpenAlexaff
Youqing Shen, Shiping Zhu, Robert Pelton

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethacrylatePolymer chemistryPolymerizationMonomerAnionic addition polymerizationChemistryLiving anionic polymerizationAlkylCopolymerPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium alkylamides are important functional initiators for anionic polymerization of methacrylates, but only sterically hindered ones can initiate a successful living polymerization. A capping method is reported here to modify nitrogen anion initiators (capping reaction) for living anionic polymerization of alkyl methacrylates. Dimethylacrylamide (DMA) and tert -butyl methacrylate ( t BMA) were found to be effective capping agents for lithium diallylamide. After capped with DMA or t BMA, the initiator efficiency of lithium diallylamide was increased from 0.1 to 0.9 for various monomers. Monosubstituted lithium alkylamides (vinyloxypropylamide and allylamide) could not directly initiate the polymerization of methacrylates due to severe reaction with the carbonyl groups in the monomers. After capped with DMA, the initiators polymerized methacrylates with initiator efficiency about 0.4−0.6, depending on the monomer type. t BMA was not suitable as capping agent for the monosubstituted lithium amides. Using these capped initiators, we subsequently synthesized block copolymers. 1 H NMR demonstrated that all the polymers prepared had terminal unsaturated groups from the initiators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207