Influenza B/Victoria Antigen Induces Strong Recall of B/Yamagata But Lower B/Victoria Response in Children Primed With Two Doses of B/Yamagata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) contains 1 of 2 influenza B/lineages (B/Yamagata or B/Victoria) annually. We assessed prime-boost responses in young children following a change in the B/lineage included in TIV. METHODS: Participants were primed during a clinical trial as infants or toddlers with two 0.25 or two 0.5 mL doses of 2008-2009 TIV containing B/Florida/4/06(Yamagata) antigen. In subsequent years, sequential subsets received annual age-appropriate doses of 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 TIV containing the changed influenza B/lineage antigen (B/Brisbane/60/08(Victoria)). Serologic response was assessed pre- and postimmunization by hemagglutination inhibition (HI; with/without ether treatment of influenza B antigen) and microneutralization. The primary immunogenicity outcome was the seroprotection rate (SPR) measured by HI without ether treatment (SPR:HI titers ≥40). RESULTS: Fifty-six children were included in 2009-2010 and 36 in 2010-2011 analyses. Before the 2009-2010 TIV dose, antibody to all 2008-2009 TIV components had fallen to low levels: SPR <10% for B/Florida/4/06(Yamagata) and B/Brisbane/60/08(Victoria) antigens. A single 2009-2010 TIV dose boosted antibody to the shared 2008-2009/2009-2010 influenza A antigens and to the priming 2008-2009 B/Florida/4/06(Yamagata) antigen with SPRs >85%. In contrast, antibody to the B/Brisbane/60/08(Victoria) antigen included in the 2009-2010 TIV remained low: SPR <25%. Antibody to the B/Brisbane/60/08(Victoria) antigen was not improved from a further dose in the 2010-2011 TIV: SPR 31% versus SPR 69% to B/Yamagata. A similar pattern of B/Yamagata dominance was observed when HI testing was conducted with antigen prepared by ether treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated annual TIV doses containing B/Victoria-lineage antigen strongly recalled antibodies to the B/Yamagata antigen of first exposure, but elicited lower B/Victoria responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".