A novel soluble analog of the HIV-1 fusion cofactor, globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), eliminates the cholesterol requirement for high affinity gp120/Gb3 interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have analyzed the interaction of adamantyl Gb(3) (adaGb(3)), a semi-synthetic soluble analog of Gb(3), with HIV-1 surface envelope glycoprotein gp120. In this analog, which was orginally designed to inhibit verotoxin binding to its glycolipid receptor, Gb(3), the fatty acid chain is replaced with a rigid globular hydrocarbon frame (adamantane). Despite its solubility, adaGb(3) forms monolayers at an air-water interface. Compression isotherms of such monolayers demonstrated that the adamantane substitution resulted in a larger minimum molecular area and a more rigid, less compressible film than Gb(3). Insertion of gp120 into adaGb(3) monolayers was exponential whereas the gp120/Gb(3) interaction curve was sigmoidal with a lag phase of 40 min. Adding cholesterol into authentic Gb(3) monolayers abrogated the lag phase and increased the initial rate of interaction with gp120. This effect of cholesterol was not observed with phosphatidylcholine or sphingomyelin. In addition, verotoxin-bound adaGb(3) or Gb(3) plus cholesterol was recovered in fractions of comparable low density after ultracentrifugation through sucrose-density gradients in the presence of Triton X-100. The unique biological and physico-chemical properties of adaGb(3) suggest that this analog may be a potent soluble mimic of Gb(3), providing a novel concept for developing GSL-derived viral fusion inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".