MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094843074 · doi:10.1007/s11999-014-4123-7

Cochrane in CORR ®: Intramedullary Nails for Extracapsular Hip Fractures in Adults (Review)

2015· review· en· W2094843074 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Evaniew, Mohit Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntramedullary rodSurgeryInternal fixationOrthopedic surgeryFixation (population genetics)Dynamic hip screwPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance of the Topic M ore than 1.5 million patients suffer hip fractures worldwide each year Thirty-day mortality approaches 5% in males and 9% in females, and many more patients experience significant functional loss and debilitation Approximately 50% of all hip fractures are extracapsular, which surgeons can treat using a wide variety of possible internal fixation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.567
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207