MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095006848 · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.3.420

A case of immunotherapy-responsive eastern equine encephalitis with diffusion-weighted imaging

2001· article· en· W2095006848 on OpenAlexaff
Meredith R. Golomb, M. Durand, Pamela W. Schaefer, Colin T. McDonald, Matheus L. Maia, Lee H. Schwamm

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyponatremiaEncephalitisComa (optics)Cerebrospinal fluidRespiratory failureLumbar punctureWhite blood cellGastroenterologyPathologyBrain biopsyInternal medicineAnesthesiaImmunologyBiopsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) is the most severe of the mosquito-borne encephalitides, associated with 30% mortality. Age over 40, rapid progression to coma, severe hyponatremia, and CSF white blood cell count >500 at symptom onset have all been correlated with poor outcome.1,2⇓ We report a patient with poor prognostic signs in whom apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images revealed vasogenic edema without ischemia. He made a complete recovery after treatment with steroids and IV immunoglobulin (IVIg). A 69-year-old man from southeastern Massachusetts developed a frontal headache, fever, and mild right upper extremity weakness precipitating admission to a local hospital. The following day, he developed fever to 104 °F, rapidly progressive flaccid paraparesis, and acute respiratory failure. A CT brain scan without contrast was normal. A lumbar puncture revealed 1196 white blood cells (WBC) (80% neutrophils, 2% lymphocytes), 12 red blood cells/cubic millimeter, total protein 140 mg/dL, and glucose 74 mg/dL (serum glucose of 121 mg/dL) without organisms on Gram stain or detection of cryptococcal antigen. Serum chemistries were normal except …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207