MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095006848 · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.3.420

A case of immunotherapy-responsive eastern equine encephalitis with diffusion-weighted imaging

2001· article· en· W2095006848 on OpenAlexaff
Meredith R. Golomb, M. Durand, Pamela W. Schaefer, Colin T. McDonald, Matheus L. Maia, Lee H. Schwamm

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyponatremiaEncephalitisComa (optics)Cerebrospinal fluidRespiratory failureLumbar punctureWhite blood cellGastroenterologyPathologyBrain biopsyInternal medicineAnesthesiaImmunologyBiopsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) is the most severe of the mosquito-borne encephalitides, associated with 30% mortality. Age over 40, rapid progression to coma, severe hyponatremia, and CSF white blood cell count >500 at symptom onset have all been correlated with poor outcome.1,2⇓ We report a patient with poor prognostic signs in whom apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images revealed vasogenic edema without ischemia. He made a complete recovery after treatment with steroids and IV immunoglobulin (IVIg). A 69-year-old man from southeastern Massachusetts developed a frontal headache, fever, and mild right upper extremity weakness precipitating admission to a local hospital. The following day, he developed fever to 104 °F, rapidly progressive flaccid paraparesis, and acute respiratory failure. A CT brain scan without contrast was normal. A lumbar puncture revealed 1196 white blood cells (WBC) (80% neutrophils, 2% lymphocytes), 12 red blood cells/cubic millimeter, total protein 140 mg/dL, and glucose 74 mg/dL (serum glucose of 121 mg/dL) without organisms on Gram stain or detection of cryptococcal antigen. Serum chemistries were normal except …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207