MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of Bisphenol-A Upon Intrauterine Implantation of Fertilized Ova in Inseminated Female Mice

2006· article· en· W2095035234 on OpenAlexaff
R Berger, Denys deCatanzaro

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLitterPregnancyGestationBisphenol AEstroneSubcutaneous injectionEndocrinologyInternal medicineFetusMedicineHormonePhysiologyAnimal scienceBiologyChemistryAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P-240 Introduction: Early pregnancy in mammals is vulnerable to environmental and hormonal changes.1 In particular, intrauterine implantation of fertilized ova in female mammals is highly sensitive to exogenous estrogens.2 Pregnancy in female mice can be terminated by nasal or cutaneous doses of 17β-estradiol lower than 0.1 microgram/day in initial days of gestation. Accordingly, we have inquired whether putative estrogenic compounds in industrial processes and domestic products can impact early pregnancy. In particular, bisphenol-A (BPA), the monomer of polycarbonate plastics, can be estrogenic3 and is found in food and human tissues.4–6 We thus designed experiments to examine the response of early pregnancy to systematically varied oral and subcutaneous doses of BPA. Methods: Inseminated female mice were either injected or orally administered doses of BPA on days 1–4 of gestation. Across groups, dose levels increased following a tripling progression. Subcutaneous injections of 0.05–0.15 ml contained BPA doses ranging from 0.04 to 3.38 mg/day/animal dissolved in peanut oil. Oral administration consisted of 1 g peanut butter/BPA mixture with BPA content ranging from 0.11% to 9%. Fresh mixture was hung daily in the cage for females to consume and any remnants weighed. Females were then left undisturbed until parturition. Litter size at birth, neonatal mortality, sex ratio, and whole litter weight were recorded. Results: At all subcutaneous doses up to 1.13 mg/day, there were no significant effects on litter size, neonatal mortality, or other measures. However, a significantly decreased litter size was observed at the 3.38 mg BPA/day/animal subcutaneous dose. Oral doses did not significantly affect the proportion of females that were parturient. However, there were indications of qualitative idiosyncratic impacts of higher oral doses upon maternal behaviour and pup survivorship. Discussion: These data indicate that BPA may have only weak estrogenic properties with respect to intrauterine implantation. A wide range of BPA doses administered orally and by subcutaneous injection have, to date, failed to produce the strong effects that are found for natural estrogens. However, the observed reductions in litter size seen with higher BPA doses do resemble effects of estradiol doses in the transition between normal and complete disruption of pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207