Fragmentation of protonated oligoalanines: Amide bond cleavage and beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fragmentation reactions of the singly-protonated oligoalanines trialanine to hexaalanine have been studied using energy-resolved mass spectrometry in MS(2) and MS(3) experiments. The primary fragmentation reactions are rationalized in terms of the b(x)-y(z) pathway of amide bond cleavage which results in formation of a proton-bound complex of an oxazolone and a peptide/amino acid; on decomposition of this complex the species of higher proton affinity preferentially retains the proton. For protonated pentaalanine and protonated hexaalanine the major primary fragmentation reaction involves cleavage of the C-terminal amide bond to form the appropriate b ion. The lower mass b ions originate largely, if not completely, by further fragmentation of the initially formed b ion. MS(3) energy-resolved experiments clearly show the fragmentation sequence b(n) --> b(n-1) --> b(n-2). A more minor pathway for the alanines involves the sequence b(n) --> a(n) --> b(n-1) --> b(n-2). The a(5) ion formed from hexaalanine loses, in part, NH(3) to begin the sequence of fragmentation reactions a(5) --> a(5)* --> a(4)* --> a(3)* where a(n)* = a(n) - NH(3). The a(3)* ion also is formed from the b(3) ion by the sequence b(3) --> a(3) --> a(3)* with the final step being sufficiently facile that the a(3) ion is not observed with significant intensity in CID mass spectra. A cyclic structure is proposed for the a(3)* ion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".