MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095111434 · doi:10.4021//jmc.v2i4.213

Hyper-IgE Syndrome: Report of Three Cases and Review of Literature

2011· article· en· W2095111434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mariana Brandão, António Marinho, Pedro Vita, Isabel Barbedo, Fátima Farinha, Julia Vasconcelos, Carlos Vasconcelos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunoglobulin EPrimary immunodeficiencyStaphylococcus aureusDermatologyConnective tissueAntibioticsAntibodyImmunodeficiencyImmunologyPathologyDiseaseMicrobiologyBacteriaImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hyper-immunoglobulin E syndrome (HIES) is a rare primary immunodeficiency disorder characterized by high serum levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE), recurrent skin and lung infections, chronic dermatitis and a variety of connective tissue and skeletal abnormalities. The bacteria that commonly infect these patients are Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae. These patients share some characteristic facial appearance and many oral manifestations. Therapy should include prolonged antibiotic therapy. We report the clinical picture of three patients that presented recurrent infections and different outcomes, and then we describe and compare with our patients the clinical, laboratory and therapeutic aspects of HIES. J Med Cases. 2011;2(4):151-155 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc213w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207