Diastereoselective formation of 18-membered ring BINOL-hydrogen phosphonate dimers - Quasi-covalent hydrogen bonds?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diastereoselective syntheses of the unusual dimers, 4-heptyl-2-(2′-hydroxy-binaphthyl)hydrogen phosphonate (5) and the cyclohexyl analogue (7), are achieved by hydrolysis of 4-(3,5-dioxa-4-phosphacyclohepta[2,1-α;3,4-α′]-dinaphthalene-4-yloxy)heptane (4) and the cyclohexane analogue (6), respectively. Two out of eight possible pairs of monomers units are involved in the stereoselective formation of the dimer 5a of configuration BINOLR-PS:BINOLR-PS; this is determined by X-ray crystallographic data, which reveal a centrosymmetric, 18-membered ring structure with Ci symmetry, consisting of two monomers strongly hydrogen-bonded between the oxygen of P=O units and hydroxyl hydrogen atoms. Mass spectrometric, melting point, and thermal decomposition point data, as well as NMR data, support the presence of strong, quasi-covalent hydrogen bonds. Computational analysis suggests that the diastereoselectivity is controlled by molecularly constrained geometry of the monomer. Compound 7, although not characterized crystallographically, appears to be analogous to 5.Key words: 18-membered ring, phosphonate dimer, diastereoselectivity, hydrogen-bonds, computational analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".