Peak Heart Rates and Sympathetic Function in Tetraplegic Nonathletes and Athletes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine differences in peak heart rate (HR) and measures of sympathetic function between nonathletes and athletes with chronic, motor-complete, cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Eight nonathletic men with SCI (C4-C7; age 47 ± 9 yr, with injury duration of 16 ± 9 yr) and 13 athletic men with SCI (C5-C8; age 37 ± 8 yr, with injury duration of 16 ± 6 yr) participated in the study. Measures of sympathetic function included palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSR) to median nerve stimulation, and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure responses to a passive sit-up test. Peak HR responses were assessed during a maximal exercise test. RESULTS: Compared to the athletic group, the nonathletic group exhibited lower peak HR (102 ± 34 vs 161 ± 20 bpm, P < 0.001) and average SSR scores (0.13 ± 0.35 vs 2.41 ± 1.97, P = 0.008), along with greater reductions in SBP and DBP in response to passive sit-up (SBP: -22 ± 10 vs -9 ± 12 mm Hg, P = 0.019; DBP: -18 ± 8 mm Hg vs -4 ± 9 mm Hg, P = 0.003). On the basis of the criteria for orthostatic hypotension (OH) (drop in SBP ≥ 20 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 10 mm Hg), 88% and 23% of nonathletes and athletes had OH. CONCLUSIONS: Attenuated peak HR in nonathletic individuals with tetraplegia may be secondary to impairments in sympathetic function including absent SSR and OH. Furthermore, the degree of preserved sympathetic function documented in tetraplegic athletes may suggest a predisposition to engage in high-performance sports. Collectively, our findings provide novel insight into the importance of the sympathetic nervous system for exercise performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".