Na<sup>+</sup>-K<sup>+</sup>-ATPase in rat skeletal muscle: content, isoform, and activity characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that muscle Na+-K+-ATPase activity is directly related to Na+-K+-ATPase content and the content of the alpha2-catalytic isoform in muscles of different fiber-type composition. To investigate this hypothesis, tissue was sampled from soleus (Sol), red gastrocnemius (RG), white gastrocnemius (WG), and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles at rest from 38 male Wistar rats weighing 413 +/- 6.0 g (mean +/- SE). Na+-K+-ATPase activity was determined in homogenates (Hom) and isolated crude membranes (CM) by the regenerating ouabain-inhibitable hydrolytic activity assay (ATPase) and the 3-O-methylfluorescein K+-stimulated phosphatase (3-O-MFPase) assay in vitro. In addition, Na+-K+-ATPase content (Bmax) and the distribution of alpha1-, alpha2-, beta1-, and beta2-isoforms were determined by [3H]ouabain binding and Western blot, respectively. For the ATPase assay, differences (P < 0.05) in enzyme activity between muscles were observed in Hom (EDL > WG) and in CM (Sol > EDL = WG). For the 3-O-MFPase assay, differences (P < 0.05) were also found for Hom (Sol > RG = EDL > WG) and CM (Sol = WG > RG). For Bmax, differences in the order of RG = EDL > Sol = WG (P < 0.05) were observed. Isoform distribution was similar between Hom and CM and indicated in CM, a greater density (P < 0.05) of alpha1 in Sol than WG and EDL (P < 0.05), but more equal distribution of alpha2 between muscles. The beta1 was greater (P < 0.05) in Sol and RG, and the beta2 was greater in EDL and WG (P < 0.05). Over all muscles, the correlation (r) between Hom 3-O-MFPase and Bmax was 0.45 (P < 0.05) and between Hom alpha2 and Bmax, 0.59 (P < 0.05). The alpha1 distribution correlated to Hom 3-O-MFPase (r = 0.79, P < 0.05) CM ATPase (r = 0.69, P < 0.005) and CM 3-O-MFPase activity (r = 0.32, P < 0.05). The alpha2 distribution was not correlated with any of the Na+-K+-ATPase activity measurements. The results indicate generally poor relationships between activity and total pump content and alpha2 isoform content of the Na+-K+-ATPase. Several factors, including the type of preparation and the type of assay, appear important in this regard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".