Synchrony of Two Brain Regions Predicts the Blood Oxygen Level Dependent Activity of a Third
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneously emerging coherent fluctuations have been long observed in electrophysiological and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. These dynamics have been identified in multiple brain areas in the 1-100 and < 0.1 Hz frequency ranges spanning neurophysiological oscillations and blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals, respectively. In this article, we demonstrate that transient neural synchronization between two sites may lead to the emergence of ultra-slow frequency fluctuations in the BOLD signal at another (third) site. Starting with a network model comprised of three neural oscillators, we illustrate the critical role of time delay and coupling strength in generating these slow coherent fluctuations as a function of intermittently occurring neural coherence. When extending the network toward biologically realistic primate connectivity, we find that the BOLD activation patterns arise from neurophysiological coherence, especially among medial cortical areas. This finding demonstrates a network-level mechanism whereby the BOLD activity at a given region is critically influenced by the neuroelectric synchronization patterns of other regions in the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".