Analysis of Compound-Specific Chlorine Stable Isotopes of Vinyl Chloride by Continuous Flow–Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (FC–IRMS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new method for determining compound-specific chlorine stable isotope was developed for vinyl chloride (VC). The analysis is carried out on a continuous flow–isotope ratio mass spectrometer (CF–IRMS) with special collectors for m/z 64 and 62. The precision of this technique is better than ± 0.16‰ (1σ) for pure phase gas injection and headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) injection. The new methodology was tested in a confined sandy aquifer contaminated with VC located near the city of Ferrara, northern Italy. The VC isotopic signatures (37Cl and 13C) showed that the VC is not a primary manufactured compound and is a byproduct of production of petrochemicals in the Ferrara region during the 1970s and 1980s. The isotope data also suggested VC is attenuated by biodegradation along the groundwater flow system. The development of compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) for VC offers a new tool for fingerprinting sources and processes that affect VC in groundwater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".