Platelet adhesion and human umbilical vein endothelial cell cytocompatibility of biodegradable segmented polyurethanes prepared with 4,4′-methylene bis(cyclohexyl isocyanate), poly(caprolactone) diol and butanediol or dithioerythritol as chain extenders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biodegradable segmented polyurethanes were prepared with poly(caprolactone) diol as a soft segment, 4,4'-methylene bis(cyclohexyl isocyanate) (HMDI) and either butanediol or dithioerythritol as chain extenders. Platelet adhesion was similar in all segmented polyurethanes studied and not different from Tecoflex® although an early stage of activation was observed on biodegradable segmented polyurethane prepared with dithioerythritol. Relative viability was higher than 80% on human umbilical vein endothelial cells in contact with biodegradable segmented polyurethane extracts after 1, 2 and 7 days. Furthermore, both biodegradable segmented polyurethane materials supported human umbilical vein endothelial cell adhesion, spreading, and viability similar to Tecoflex® medical-grade polyurethane. These biodegradable segmented polyurethanes represent promising materials for cardiovascular applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".