Chinese Collaboration with Japan 1932-1945: The Limits of Accommodation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface David P. Barrett and Larry N. Shyu Note on romanization Maps Introduction: occupied China and the limits of accommodation David P. Barrett Part I. Negotiations With Japan: Official, Unofficial, and Covert: 1. Wang Jingwei and the policy origins of the 'peace movement', 1932-1937 Wang Ke-wen 2. Regional office and the national interest: song zheyuan in North China, 1933-1937 Marjorie Dryburgh 3. Nationalist China's negotiating position during the stalemate, 1938-1945 Huang Meizhen and Yang Hanqing Part II. Client Regimes: Genesis, Character and Justification: 4. The creation of the reformed government in central China, 1938 Timothy Brook 5. The Wang Jingwei regime, 1940-1945: communities and disjunctures with nationalist China David P. Barrett 6. Survival as justification for collaboration, 1937-1945 Lo Jiu-jung Part III. Elite Collaboration: Opportunism, Obstacles and Ambiguities: 7. Japan's new order and the Shanghai capitalists: conflict and collaboration, 1937-1945 Parks M. Coble 8. Patterns and dynamics of elite collaboration in occupied shaoxing country R. Keith Schoppa 9. Resistance in collaboration: Chinese cinema in occupied Shanghai, 1941-1945 Poshek Fu Part IV. The Hinterland: Collaboration, Resistance and Anarchy: 10. The war within a war: a case study of a county on the North China Plain Peter J. Seybolt 11. Communist sources for localizing the study of the Sino-Japanese War Odoric Y. K. Wou Notes Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".