MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095330365 · doi:10.1080/15504263.2012.671067

A Preliminary Feasibility Study of Varenicline for Smoking Cessation in Bipolar Disorder

2012· article· en· W2095330365 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Becky S. Wu, Andrea H. Weinberger, Enza Mancuso, Victoria C. Wing, Bahar Haji-Khamneh, Andrea Levinson, Tony P. George

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dual Diagnosis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaPfizer
KeywordsVareniclineAddictionSmoking cessationMental healthSubstance abusePsychiatryMedicinePsychologyNicotine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our review of studies examining smoking cessation interventions among persons with bipolar disorders (George, Wu, & Weinberger, 2012, this issue) shows the need for safe and efficacious smoking ces...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dual DiagnosisSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207