X‐ray photoelectron and carbon Kα emission measurements and calculations of O‐, CO‐, N‐, and S‐containing substances
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract X‐ray fluorescence measurements for O‐containing [polyethylene oxide, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl methyl ether], CO‐containing [polyvinyl methyl ketone, polyethylene terephthalate], N‐containing [poly‐4‐vinylpyridine (P4VP), polyaniline oligomer (PAO)], and S‐containing [polyphenylene sulfide] substances are presented. Carbon Kα X‐ray emission spectra (XES) and X‐ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) are compared with our DFT calculations performed with the Amsterdam density functional (ADF) program. The combined analysis of valence XPS and carbon Kα XES allows us to determine the individual contributions from pσ‐ and pπ‐bonding molecular orbitals of the polymers. The ΔSCF calculations yield the accurate C1s core‐electron binding energies (CEBEs) for all carbon sites of the organic compound. We calculate all CEBEs of the model molecules using the Δ E KS approach. Our simulated C1s photoelectron and C Kα emission spectra are in good agreement with our measurements. We also obtain WD (work function and the other energies) values for the polymers and PAO from the difference between calculated (gas‐phase) and measured (solid) CEBE values. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 162–172, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it