MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095337079 · doi:10.1002/star.201200132

On the organization of chains in amylopectin

2012· article· en· W2095337079 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStarch - Stärke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmylopectinSteric effectsAmorphous solidChemistryStarchAbsorption (acoustics)Maxima and minimaIodineCrystallographyMaterials scienceStereochemistryOrganic chemistryAmyloseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The visualization of organization of chains in amylopectin remains a subject of debate. The traditional and backbone model are the two currently cited models, but there have been no attempts to provide experimental evidence to test the validity of either model. This study tests the hypothesis based on iodine binding by lintners and limit dextrins. Data show that starch lintners bound iodine in amorphous blocklets below the large blocklets, based on AFM. Based on the absorption maxima observed, it suggested that chains in the amorphous blocklets likely pre‐exist as loose helices and are of DP 19–24 that can bind iodine. Further investigations using limit dextrins and their sequential hydrolysis products clearly provide contrast between the traditional and backbone models. Data in this study suggests that it is unlikely that the internal chains in traditional model can bind iodine, due to steric hinderances and result in the absorption maxima observed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it