MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095424597 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/64

THE PUZZLING EARLY DETECTION OF LOW VELOCITY<sup>56</sup>Ni DECAY LINES IN SN 2014J: HINTS OF A COMPACT REMNANT

2015· article· en· W2095424597 on OpenAlex
Rachid Ouyed, D. A. Leahy, Nico Koning, Jan E. Staff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that the low-velocity 56Ni decay lines detected earlier than expected in the type Ia SN 2014J find an explanation in the Quark-Nova Ia model which involves the thermonuclear explosion of a tidally disrupted sub-Chandrasekhar White Dwarf in a tight Neutron-Star-White-Dwarf binary system. The explosion is triggered by impact from the Quark-Nova ejecta on the WD material; the Quark-Nova is the explosive transition of the Neutron star to a Quark star triggered by accretion from a CO torus (the circularized WD material). The presence of a compact remnant (the Quark Star) provides: (i) an additional energy source (spin-down power) which allows us to fit the observed light-curve including the steep early rise; (ii) a central gravitational potential which slows down some of the 56Ni produced to velocities of a few 1000 km/s. In our model, the 56Ni decay lines become optically visible at ~20 days from explosion time in agreement with observations. We list predictions that can provide important tests for our model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it