Experimental African trypanosomiasis: lack of effective CD1d‐restricted antigen presentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BALB/c mice are highly susceptible to African trypanosomiasis, whereas C57BL/6 mice are relatively resistant. Other investigators have reported that the synthesis of IgG antibodies to purified membrane form of variant surface glycoprotein (mfVSG) of Trypanosoma brucei is CD1 restricted. In this study, we examine the role of the CD1d/NKT cell pathway in susceptibility and resistance of mice to infection by African trypanosomes. Administration of anti-CD1d antibodies to Trypanosoma congolense-infected BALB/c mice neither affects the parasitemia nor the survival time. Correspondingly, CD1d(-/-) and CD1d(+/+) BALB/c mice infected with T. congolense or T. brucei show no differences in either parasitaemia or survival time. The course of disease in relative resistant C57BL/6 mice infected with T. congolense is also not affected by the absence of CD1d. Parasitaemia, survival time, and plasma levels of IgG2a and IgG3 parasite-specific antibodies in infected CD1d(-/-) C57BL/6 are not different from those of infected CD1d(+/+) C57BL/6 mice. We conclude that CD1d-restricted immune responses do not play an important role in susceptibility/resistance of mice infected with virulent African trypanosomes. We speculate that virulent trypanosomes have an evasion mechanism that prevents the induction of a parasite-specific, CD1d-restricted immune response by the host.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".