MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Palestinian Suicide Bombing Revisited: A Critique of the Outbidding Thesis

2008· article· en· W2095529305 on OpenAlex
Robert J. Brym, Bader Araj

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitical Science Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed Forces
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrorismSubject (documents)State (computer science)PoliticsPolitical scienceDoctoral dissertationSociologyCriminologyMedia studiesLawSocial scienceLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ROBERT J. BRYM is professor of sociology at the University of Toronto. He has published widely on the social bases of Russian and Canadian politics and is now researching collective and state violence in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza during the second intifada. His recent articles on the latter subject have appeared in Social Forces, Contexts, and The Canadian Journal of Sociology. BADER ARAJ is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Toronto. He is completing his dissertation on suicide bombing in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza during the second intifada. His recent articles on this subject have appeared in Social Forces and Studies in Conflict and Terrorism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it