Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plants maintain mutualistic symbioses with multiple symbiont genotypes that differ in the benefits they provide. To investigate differences in the effect of nitrogen-fixing Frankia on Alnus species, spore-producing (sp+) nodules from Alnus rubra Bong. and Alnus incana subsp. rugosa (Du Roi) Clausen and non-spore-producing (sp–) nodules from Alnus viridis subsp. crispa (Ait.) Turrill, A. rubra, and A. incana subsp. rugosa were collected from each of four different populations and used to inoculate all three Alnus species. As expected, sp+ Frankia produced significantly more nodules on all three species. However, A. crispa, which normally does not have sp+ nodules in the field, was more susceptible to a high level of infection by sp+ Frankia in general, and by any source of sp+ Frankia in particular, whereas A. incana subsp. rugosa, which has the highest abundance of sp+ in the field, was less susceptible to high levels of infection. This suggests that A. incana subsp. rugosa develops resistance to high levels of infection. The infectivity of an sp+ Frankia source on A. viridis subsp. crispa and A. rubra was positively correlated with the proportion of sp+ nodules on the site it was collected from, suggesting that the variation in the abundance of sp+ in the field is caused by sp+ Frankia with different levels of infectivity. There was no effect of Frankia sources on nodule allocation. Plant growth was positively correlated with the specific nodule mass and the specific nodule activity, and negatively correlated with the nodule number per plant. Sp+ Frankia resulted in significantly smaller plants in A. rubra. While there was no overall sp+ type effect on the growth of A. viridis subsp. crispa, the largest plants always resulted when they were inoculated with sp–, and the smallest with sp+ Frankia. Neither spore type nor inoculum source had any effect on the performance of A. rugosa. These results suggest that Alnus species remain susceptible to infection by both Frankia spore types, but are able to modulate the effectiveness of these spore types when they are the common symbionts in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".