Pancreatoblastoma with portal vein involvement in a child: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pancreatoblastoma is a rare pancreatic tumor in children. Its biologic behavior is aggressive with frequent local invasion, recurrence, and metastasis , for which there has been no standard treatment regimen. A 13-year old Japanese girl had pancreatoblastoma arising from the pancreas head and body and invading the portal vein. The tumor was resected with pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with reconstruction of the portal and splenic vein using native left common iliac vein graft, followed by chemotherapy. The tumor recurred in the liver and periportal lymph node but was treated with surgical resection and chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The reconstructed portal vein has been patent with no sign of stricture for 3.5 years after the first operation. She has been well with a second complete remission for 10 months. Complete surgical resection has been considered for long-term survival of patients with pancreatoblastoma. Portal venous involvement is not a contraindication of surgical resection of pancreatic tumors and may be aggressively treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal venous reconstruction using a venous conduit. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation has been used in only two other pediatric cases in the literature for treating pancreatoblastoma. Although our follow-up period is short, aggressive surgical and chemotherapeutic regimen may hold therapeutic promise for managing advanced or relapsed pancreatoblastoma in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".