External K<sup>+</sup> relieves the block but not the gating shift caused by Zn<sup>2+</sup> in human Kv1.5 potassium channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. We used the whole-cell recording technique to examine the effect of extracellular Zn(2+) on macroscopic currents due to Kv1.5 channels expressed in the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293. 2. Fits of a Boltzmann function to tail current amplitudes showed that 1 mM Zn2+ shifted the half-activation voltage from -10.2 +/- 0.4 to 21.1 +/- 0.7 mV and the slope factor increased from 6.8 +/- 0.4 to 9.4 +/- 0.7 mV. The maximum conductance in 1 mM Zn2+ and with 3.5 mM K(+)o was 33 +/- 7 % of the control value. 3. In physiological saline the apparent KD for the Zn(2+) block was 650 +/- 24 M and was voltage independent. A Hill coefficient of 1.0 +/- 0.03 implied that block is mediated by the occupation of a single binding site. 4. Increasing the external concentration of K(+) ([K(+)]o) inhibited the block by Zn(2+). Estimates of the apparent K(D) of the Zn(2+) block in 0, 5 and 135 mM K(+) were 69, 650 and 2100 M, respectively. External Cs(+) relieved the Zn(2+) block but was less effective than K(+). Changing [K(+)]o did not affect the Zn(2+)-induced gating shift. 5. A model of allosteric inhibition fitted to the relationship between the block by Zn(2+) and the block relief by external K(+) gave KD estimates of approximately 70 M for Zn(2+) and approximately 500 M for K(+). 6. We propose that the gating shift and the block caused by Zn(2+) are mediated by two distinct sites and that the blocking site is located in the external mouth of the pore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".