Surgical Outcome of Discrete Subaortic Stenosis in Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discrete subaortic stenosis is notable for its unpredictable hemodynamic progression in childhood and high reoperation rate; however, data about adulthood are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult patients who previously underwent surgery for discrete subaortic stenosis were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort study. Mixed-effects and joint models were used to assess the postoperative progression of discrete subaortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, as well as reoperation. A total of 313 patients at 4 centers were included (age at baseline, 20.2 years [25th-75th percentile, 18.4-31.0 years]; 52% male). Median follow-up duration was 12.9 years (25th-75th percentile, 6.2-20.1 years), yielding 5617 patient-years. The peak instantaneous left ventricular outflow tract gradient decreased from 75.7±28.0 mm Hg preoperatively to 15.1±14.1 mm Hg postoperatively (P<0.001) and thereafter increased over time at a rate of 1.31±0.16 mm Hg/y (P=0.001). Mild aortic regurgitation was present in 68% but generally did not progress over time (P=0.76). A preoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradient ≥80 mm Hg was a predictor for progression to moderate aortic regurgitation postoperatively. Eighty patients required at least 1 reoperation (1.8% per patient-year). Predictors for reoperation included female sex (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.30) and left ventricular outflow tract gradient progression (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.62). Additional myectomy did not reduce the risk for reoperation (P=0.92) but significantly increased the risk of a complete heart block requiring pacemaker implantation (8.1% versus 1.7%; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Survival is excellent after surgery for discrete subaortic stenosis; however, reoperation for recurrent discrete subaortic stenosis is not uncommon. Over time, the left ventricular outflow tract gradient slowly increases and mild aortic regurgitation is common, although generally nonprogressive over time. Myectomy does not show additional advantages, and because it is associated with an increased risk of complete heart block, it should not be performed routinely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".