Prevalence of elevated pulmonary arterial pressures measured by echocardiography in a multicenter study of patients with systemic sclerosis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of elevated pulmonary arterial pressures (PAP) as a correlate for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in rheumatology centers in Canada. METHODS: During the one-year study period (June 2002-May 2003), charts of patients with SSc were reviewed to determine demographics, SSc characteristics, percentage of patients with a PAH diagnosis, and the site criteria for such diagnosis. Subjects with no PAH that had symptoms of dyspnea and/or fatigue were invited to undergo Doppler echocardiography to estimate their systolic PAP (sPAP). RESULTS: A total of 539 patients with SSc (age 56 yrs +/- 13 SD, 84% female, 41% with diffuse SSc, 58% limited SSc, SSc disease duration 9 yrs +/- 7 SD) at 8 rheumatology centers were reviewed. Twenty-three percent of patients were diagnosed with elevated sPAP based on the site diagnosis criteria (i.e., > 30 mm Hg or > 35 mm Hg). From the non-PAH, not recently screened patients that had symptoms of dyspnea or fatigue, a total of 89 patients underwent a Doppler echocardiograph; 40% had sPAP > 35 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Elevated PAP are common in both limited and diffuse SSc disease, occurring in 21% of limited and 26% of diffuse SSc patients. During the screening most patients had mild PAP elevations that would require further assessments such as right heart catheterization to diagnose PAH where appropriate. A high index of suspicion is important and routine echocardiography in symptomatic patients may allow earlier diagnosis of PAH and intervention. The proportion of SSc patients with mild to moderate elevations of PAP who will develop significant PAH is unknown and longterm studies are needed to address the natural progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".