MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095699852 · doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.601714

New exceptional specimens of<i>Prognathodon overtoni</i>(Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the upper Campanian of Alberta, Canada, and the systematics and ecology of the genus

2011· article· en· W2095699852 on OpenAlexaffabout
Takuya Konishi, Donald B. Brinkman, Judy A. Massare, Michael W. Caldwell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaRoyal Tyrrell Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystematicsSquamataGenusPaleontologyTaxonBiologyNeotenyType speciesGeologyZoologyTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Currently known from the early Campanian to late Maastrichtian, Prognathodon constitutes a group of mosasaurine mosasaurs that typically possessed massive jaws. Only four articulated skulls are known to date and the information concerning their postcrania remains minimal. Moreover, the early to middle Campanian specimens of the taxon are extremely rare and fragmentary. Two new specimens of Prognathodon overtoni from the early late Campanian (ca. 74.5 Ma) Bearpaw Formation exposed near Welling, southern Alberta, Canada, provide the first fully articulated skeletons of the genus. Detailed morphological assessment of these and pre-existing specimens indicates that many cranial characters are shared between P. overtoni and the generic type P. solvayi from the early Maastrichtian, including (1) short premaxillary-maxillary suture; (2) short triangular frontal with marked anterior constriction; and (3) distinct, blind-ended median opening on medullary floor of basioccipital. These are interpreted as generically diagnostic characters, and the first character in particular distinguishes Prognathodon from Liodon and other long-snouted mosasaurines. The postcranium of P. overtoni is lightly built, and differs very little from that of Clidastes, a basal mosasaurine. Marginal teeth are carinate with fine crenulations, indicating their proposed opportunistic predatory behavior. Additionally, most of the fully erupted teeth exhibit a similar degree of apical wear, which is interpreted as indicating that the taxon regularly handled prey items that involved crunching. To augment these dietary inferences, gut contents from one of the new specimens include fragments of a large and a small fish, a sea turtle, and possibly a cephalopod.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vertebrate PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207