Neck circumference percentile: A screening tool for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Large neck circumference (NC) is associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults, especially males. Since NC changes with age and sex, a lack of reference ranges makes neck size difficult to assess as a screening tool in children. METHODS: Using a population-based dataset of 1,913 children, we developed reference ranges for NC by age and sex for children aged 6-17 years. In this study, we collected NC data on 245 children aged 6-17 years presenting to the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario for polysomnography. The association between NC>the 95th percentile and OSA (total apnea-hypopnea-index>5 events/hr and/or obstructive-apnea-index ≥ 1 event/hr) was explored. Thresholds of BMI percentile and waist circumference were also examined. RESULTS: Individuals with NC>95th percentile for age and sex had increased risk of OSA (relative risk 1.7 [95% CI 1.0-3.0], P=0.04), compared to those with NC ≤ 95th percentile. BMI ≥ 95th percentile gave similar results (relative risk 1.8 [95% CI 1.1-2.9], P=0.02). When examined by sex, the association was significant in males ≥ 12 years (relative risk 3.3 [95% CI 1.0-10.4], P=0.04), but not females (P=0.63). Neither BMI ≥ 95th percentile nor waist circumference>95th percentile was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Children and youth with NC>95th percentile for age and sex have significantly increased risk of OSA. This effect is significant in males ≥ 12 years, whereas BMI is not. NC percentile may be an additional screening tool for OSA in children and youth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".