MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resorbable and Nonresorbable Hydroxyapatite Granules as Bone Graft Substitutes in Rabbit Cortical Defects

2003· article· en· W2095758957 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elisabeth Liljensten, Erik Adolfsson, K.‐G. Strid, Peter Thomsen

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranule (geology)DentistryCortical boneTibiaBone formationChemistryAnatomyMedicineMaterials scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The use of various synthetic calcium phosphate compositions for the promotion of bone in bone defects is of potential interest because such materials may be tailor made and may bond to bone. There is yet an inadequate knowledge of the role of calcium phosphate composition and resorbability for the bone response. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the ability of resorbable versus nonresorbable hydroxyapatite (HA) granules to promote new bone formation in cortical bone defects. Resorbable and nonresorbable HA granules, used as bone graft substitutes, were evaluated after 6 weeks and 3 months in the rabbit tibia. Circular defects (diameter 5.0 mm) were made in both tibias of 18 New Zealand white rabbits. The 36 defects were divided into three groups (six observations per group and time, respectively). The first group was augmented with resorbable HA granules, the second group was augmented with ceramic nonresorbable HA granules, and the third group was left without augmentation (control). The animals were killed after 6 weeks and 3 months, and the tissue was evaluated with light microscopic (LM) morphology and morphometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDX). RESULTS: After 3 months LM morphometry revealed significantly more newly formed bone in the two HA augmented groups compared with that in the control. A close contact was found between both kinds of HA granules and new bone as viewed with light microscopy and SEM. A relatively slow degradation process was indicated by the small reduction of the total granule area in the cortical defects. However, LM observations showed a change of granule form. Pilot experiments using SEM-EDX indicate that Ca and P contents had decreased in the resorbable HA granules between 6 weeks and 3 months. Further, a higher content of Ca and P was found in the newly formed bone close to granules, in comparison with more distant newly formed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both resorbable and nonresorbable HA granules promote new bone formation in rabbit cortical defects, which does not occur in control defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207