MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095804586 · doi:10.18740/s48884

Assessing Employment Risk: New Dimensions in the Measurement of Unemployment.

2009· article· en· W2095804586 on OpenAlexaffvenue
John Shields, Susan Silver, Sue Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueSocialist studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnemploymentRestructuringRetrenchmentGlobeVulnerability (computing)Economic securityEconomic restructuringPopulationSocial securityEconomicsRisk societySociologyDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthPsychologyMarket economySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contemporary era has increasingly come to be characterized as a 'risk society' (Beck, 1992).This idea underlies a growing sense of insecurity that large segments of the population feel and experience.Much of this increased insecurity is the consequence of global economic restructuring and the retrenchment of the 'social security state' (Hahnel, 2005; Eliott and Atkinson, 1998;and Wolman and Colamosca, 1997).The problem of growing economic risk was the subject of a recent International Labour Organization (ILO) report which concluded that economic security was out of reach for the majority of the globe's workers creating a 'world of anxiety and anger ' (2004a).Even in the developed world neoliberal inspired policies and restructuring have enhanced economic vulnerability as the divide between 'haves' and 'have-nots' grows (Burke, Mooers & Shields, 2000)."Work risk" is an important, if not central, facet of economic risk.We wish to address one dimension of "work risk", namely the threat of unemployment.Unemployment is important because working for pay is the primary way in which most individuals and families are able to achieve a measure of economic security and are able to more fully ground themselves in their societies thus forestalling social exclusion.However, our comprehension of the full extent of unemployment is limited by our reliance on conventional measures.High unemployment is a global issue.According to the ILO 30% of the world's labour force is either unemployed or seriously underemployed.By the end of the 1990s, there were 140 million unemployed workers worldwide (ILO, 1998: 1), and by 2003 this had climbed to 185.9 million or some 6.2% of the global labour force, "the highest 1 The research reported here was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council grant.We would also like to thank Philip Giles from Statistics Canada for his technical support, though the interpretation of the data are those of the authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocialist studiesSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207