MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095810703 · doi:10.1104/pp.106.077313

Sequencing Multiple and Diverse Rice Varieties. Connecting Whole-Genome Variation with Phenotypes

2006· article· en· W2095810703 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Richard Bruskiewich, D. J. Mackill, C. Robin Buell, Jan E. Leach, Hei Leung

Bibliographic record

VenuePLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsVariation (astronomy)BiologyPhenotypeGenomeGeneticsWhole genome sequencingComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Rice Functional Genomics Consortium (IRFGC) has initiated a project to provide the rice research community with access to extensive information on genetic variation present within and between diverse rice cultivars and landraces, as well as the genetic resources to exploit that information. Among crop plants, rice is uniquely positioned to achieve this goal due to the release of a high-quality, whole-genome sequence; advances in the use of high-density arrays to compare complex genomes; and the availability of large collections of genetic materials rich in trait variation. In this project, the international rice research community will collaborate with Perlegen Sciences to identify a large fraction of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) present in cultivated rice through whole-genome comparisons of 21 rice genomes, including cultivars, germplasm lines, and landraces. The SNP data will be entirely public (www.oryzasnp.org) and can be used to identify a collection of SNPs for undertaking whole-genome scans. Initial funding for this effort has been provided by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), the Generation Challenge Program, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service. In this communication, we wish to inform the research community about this project, to mobilize the research community to participate in detailed phenotyping of these lines, and to provide the opportunity to nominate additional candidate lines for a potential extension of this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLANT PHYSIOLOGYSame topicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsFrench-language works237,207