Comparative analysis of the miRNA profiles from Taenia solium and Taenia asiatica adult
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taenia solium and Taenia asiatica are zoonotic parasites which are transmitted between pigs and humans, with pigs acting as the intermediate host and humans as the definitive host. The aim of the present study was to compare the microRNA (miRNA) profiles between T. solium and T. asiatica by Solexa deep sequencing and bioinformatic analyses. A total of 18.26 and 15.24 million reads with high quality and three new miRNAs were obtained in each species, respectively. The two cestodes shared nearly the same level of total sRNA, but the known miRNAs were in a very different manner. Nucleotide guanine (G) and uracil (U) were the most frequently used first nucleotide in both T. solium and T. asiatica, respectively. Furthermore, it was also found that there were great differences in the kinds and copy numbers of miRNAs among the two Taenia species, which might indicate the different evolutions in the two parasites. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the characterization of the miRNA profiles for the two Taenia cestodes, and it would lay a foundation for further functional studies of miRNAs of T. solium and T. asiatica. Key words: Taenia solium, Taenia asiatica, microRNA profiles, human, pig.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".