MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095900487 · doi:10.1139/b02-061

Drought tolerance characteristics of black spruce (<i>Picea mariana</i>) seedlings in relation to sodium sulfate and sodium chloride injury

2002· article· en· W2095900487 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Edmund Bancroft. Redfield, Janusz J. Zwiazek

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSeedling growth and survival studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSyncrude
KeywordsBlack spruceSodiumOsmotic pressureChemistryHorticultureTurgor pressureChlorideSowingSalinityBotanyBiochemistryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the feasibility of using water relations to screen black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP) planting stock for salt tolerance, prior to planting in saline oil sands tailings. To do so, water relations parameters were derived from pressure–volume curves for individual seedlings prior to salt stress treatments. Pressure–volume curves were constructed for branches removed from the seedlings and the seedlings were subsequently treated with 60 mM NaCl, 120 mM NaCl, or 90 mM Na 2 SO 4 in solution culture. After 2 weeks of treatment, seedlings treated with NaCl solutions had greater needle electrolyte leakage and visible needle injury compared with equimolar and iso-osmotic solutions of Na 2 SO 4 , suggesting that chloride played a role in needle injury. At turgor loss point, a more negative osmotic potential was significantly correlated with lower electrolyte leakage in seedlings treated with Na 2 SO 4 but not in those treated with NaCl. The results suggest that, in contrast with NaCl, Na 2 SO 4 injury to black spruce seedlings may be largely due to osmotic stress and that drought tolerance parameters may be more helpful in predicting salt tolerance in plants treated with Na 2 SO 4 than in those treated with NaCl.Key words: osmotic stress, salt stress, drought tolerance, water relations, ion toxicity, black spruce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicSeedling growth and survival studiesFrench-language works237,207