“A Land of Bamboo Groves”: Collective-Owned Forest Tenure Reform in Southern China and Its Environmental Impacts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental sustainability is a priority in China’s economic and social development. This article reviews the three-decade evolvement of forest tenure reform in China’s southern collectively-owned forest areas, and makes a preliminary assessment of the environmental impacts of the tenure transformation. We focus especially on an area that has been in the vanguard of reform—Sanming Prefecture in Fujian province. Transition paths that have shaped diverse forest tenure forms differ from place to place in southern China. Entirely new property rights and social relations have been created, largely on local initiative, in a brief time. De-collectivization and market oriented policies in general have supplied incentives for widespread forest planting and investment to supply new industries, with complex environmental impacts. The farmers involve express satisfaction with how the new tenure system has improved their autonomy and livelihoods. Further, systems of payments for environmental services are just beginning to emerge. However, comprehensive and integrative assessment of those effects at landscape level is in its infancy. A more adaptive strategy for monitoring effects and improving environmental performance in the land of bamboo groves is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".