MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095989866

Eficacia del Tratamiento de la Cefalea Tensional Mediante Terapia Articulatoria y de Tejido Blando Subocccipital

2010· dissertation· es· W2095989866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
López Espí, Gemma Victoria

Bibliographic record

VenueTDR (Tesis Doctorales en Red) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La cefalea tensional tiene una elevada prevalencia, con repercusion en el ambito laboral y social de los sujetos que la padecen. Considerando estudios previos, el objetivo de esta investigacion es evaluar la eficacia de dos tratamientos con terapia manual en pacientes con cefalea tensional. Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio a doble ciego, aleatorio, con 84 pacientes (81% mujeres) diagnosticados de cefalea tensional, con edad media de 39,76 anos (DT=11,38), distribuidos en 4 grupos (tres de tratamiento y un grupo de control placebo). Los tratamientos incluyen terapia manual con: 1) inhibicion del tejido blando suboccipital; 2) articulatoria occipucio-atlas-axis; 3) la combinacion de ambas. Se aplicaron 4 sesiones, con periodicidad semanal, y seguimiento a los 15 y a los 30 dias. La evaluacion antes y despues el tratamiento y en los seguimientos abarco: valoracion de la movilidad cervical (goniometro cervical CROM), ansiedad (STAI-E/R), depresion (Inventario de Beck), calidad de vida (SF-12), impacto del dolor (HIT-6), percepcion del dolor (Cuestionario del dolor McGill), discapacidad por el dolor (HDI) e intensidad del dolor (EVA). La frecuencia del dolor, ingesta de farmacos sintomaticos, horas de sueno y factores asociados, se evaluaron mediante un autorregistro. Los resultados han mostrado que el tratamiento con inhibicion ha mejorado significativamente en depresion, impacto, discapacidad y percepcion por dolor (p=0,001 a p=0,01), y en la flexion suboccipital y cervical (p=0,02 y p=0,03). Tanto el tratamiento articulatorio como el combinado, han mejorado en ansiedad, depresion, e impacto discapacidad, percepcion e intensidad del dolor (p=0,000 a p=0,02); y en flexion y extension suboccipital (p=0,003 a p=0,04). El tratamiento articulatorio mejora tambien en las rotaciones cervicales derecha (p=0,007) e izquierda (p=0,03). En conclusion, tanto el tratamiento articulatorio como el combinado son eficaces para los pacientes con cefaleas en la mayor parte de las evaluaciones realizadas. El tratamiento con inhibicion, aunque con resultados inferiores, tambien ha sido positivo respecto a diferentes ambitos de la cefalea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTDR (Tesis Doctorales en Red)Same topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207