Elevated CD16 expression by monocytes from patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated periodic syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) is an inherited autosomal-dominant autoinflammatory condition caused by mutations in the ectodomain of the 55-kd tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily 1A. Proinflammatory blood monocytes with the phenotype CD14+,CD16+,HLA-DR++ are a major source of TNF, and the number of such monocytes is increased during infection and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the expression of circulating CD16+ monocytes is affected in patients with TRAPS. METHODS: Peripheral blood obtained from patients with TRAPS and healthy control subjects was stained with monoclonal antibodies to detect CD14++,CD16- monocytes and CD14+,CD16+ monocytes, using flow cytometry. Lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF production was measured by intracellular cytokine staining. Activation-induced shedding of CD16 was investigated by treating blood samples with phorbol myristate acetate. RESULTS: The level of CD16 expression by CD14+,CD16+ monocytes, but not their absolute number, was significantly elevated in patients with TRAPS, even though the patients were not experiencing clinically overt episodes of autoinflammation at the time of sampling. These findings are similar to those for the C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rates in the same patients. The enhanced level of CD16 expression by monocytes from patients with TRAPS was not attributable to a defect in activation-induced shedding of CD16. The CD14+,CD16+ monocytes were the predominant source of TNF in both patients and healthy control subjects. CONCLUSION: The level of CD16 expression by monocytes was elevated in patients with TRAPS, as a feature of the underlying constitutive inflammation status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".