Thermal performance of trench backfills used for frost protection of water service lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the thermal performance of different configurations of trenches using various trench geometries and backfill and insulation materials. A limited number of laboratory tests were conducted to confirm the thermal properties of the backfills reported in the literature. The frost protection of water service is measured in terms of the number of days it takes for the frost front to reach the depth of water service lines under sustained subzero surface temperatures. The study specifically included typical granular materials used within the City of Ottawa (formerly the Region of Ottawa-Carleton), but the findings can be equally applied to other urban areas in Canada where the surficial terrain is rocky. The thermal analyses of the trenches were conducted using the finite element method that appropriately represents phase changes when the temperature falls below the freezing point of water. The analyses indicate that the use of sandwich insulation is ineffective, and that latent heat of backfill and native soils has a great impact on the frost protection of water service lines. A list of possible trench depths with different backfills and their thermal performance is provided.Key words: backfill, thermal performance, frost penetration, water service, finite element analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".