MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096148540 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2009.5075437

Design of a permanent magnet synchronous machine for a flywheel energy storage system within a hybrid electric vehicle

2009· article· en· W2096148540 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Jiang, John Salmon, Andrew M. Knight

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlywheelFlywheel energy storageTotal harmonic distortionCogging torquePermanent magnet synchronous generatorEnergy storageAutomotive engineeringTorqueMagnetFinite element methodComputer sciencePower (physics)VoltageEngineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an energy storage device, the flywheel has significant advantages over conventional chemical batteries, such like higher energy density, higher efficiency, longer life time, and less environment pollution. Flywheel technology have been widely used in varies of areas, including power system, space craft, and hybrid electric vehicles (HEV). An effective flywheel system mainly attribute to its good motor /generator (M/G) design. This paper describes the design of a permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) as an M/G suitable for integration in a flywheel energy storage system within a large HEV. The operating requirements of the application include wide power and speed ranges combined with high total system efficiency. The machine described in this paper has been designed to meet these requirements together with a number of additional constrains that include restricted dimensions, voltage and current limits. Along with presenting the design, essential issues upon PMSM design including cogging torque, iron losses and total harmonic distortion (THD) are investigated, and certain strategies as solutions to those issues have been introduced and compared. An iterative approach combining lumped parameter analysis with 2D finite element analysis (FEA) is used, and the final design is also presented showing great performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207