Growth hormone secretion decreases with age in paediatric <scp>P</scp>rader‐<scp>W</scp>illi syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency is a common feature of Prader-Willi syndrome; however, biochemical deficiency is not uniformly demonstrated. Criteria for GH treatment in paediatric PWS vary with some countries requiring documentation of biochemical GH deficiency. Data regarding the significance of age in the interpretation of GH stimulation test results, particularly in infants, are lacking. We aimed to assess age-related trends in the prevalence of biochemical GH deficiency in infants and children with PWS. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted. Data from children with Prader-Willi syndrome that had GH stimulation tests performed at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto between the years 2000 and 2012 were collected. PATIENT: Charts of 47 children 0·4-15·5 years of age with PWS that had GH stimulation tests were reviewed. MEASUREMENTS: Biochemical GH status in relation to age and body mass index. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 47 patients (68%) were biochemically GH deficient. GH deficiency was significantly associated with older age (r = 0·45, P = 0·02) and higher body-mass-index z-score (r = 0·45, P = 0·02). Biochemical GH deficiency was less prevalent up to 18 months of age (3/11 27%) compared with older children (29/36 [81%]; P = 0·001). A higher prevalence of GH deficiency was also detected in obese patients (14/16 [88%]) compared with nonobese patients (18/31 [58%]; P = 0·04). CONCLUSIONS: The utility of performing GH stimulation tests as an indication of GH status under 18 months of age in Prader-Willi syndrome is questionable. If performed, results should be carefully interpreted in the context of age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".