MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096274411 · doi:10.1017/s1743921307011635

Joint Discussion 17 Highlights of recent progress in the seismology of the Sun and Sun-like stars

2006· article· en· W2096274411 on OpenAlexaff
T. R. Bedding, A. S. Brun, J. Christensen‐Dalsgaard, A. D. Crouch, P. De Cat, R. A. García, L. Gizon, F. Hill, H. Kjeldsen, J. W. Leibacher, Jean-Pierre Maillard, S. Mathis, M. C. Rabello‐Soares, J. P. Rozelot, M. Rempel, I. W. Roxburgh, R. Samadi, S. Talon, M. J. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservatoryPhysicsSatelliteStarsAstronomyOscillation (cell signaling)Solar observatoryHelioseismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The seismology and physics of localized structures beneath the surface of the Sun takes on a special significance with the completion in 2006 of a solar cycle of observations by the ground-based Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) and by the instruments on board theSolar and Heliospheric Observatory(SOHO). Of course, the spatially unresolved Birmingham Solar Oscillation Network (BiSON) has been observing for even longer. At the same time, the testing of models of stellar structure moves into high gear with the extension of deep probes from the Sun to other solar-like stars and other multi-mode pulsators, with ever-improving observations made from the ground, the success of theMOSTsatellite, and the recently launchedCoRoTsatellite. Here we report the current state of the two closely related and rapidly developing fields of helio- and asteroseimology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207