Duplication of Subcytoband 11E2 of Chromosome 11 Is Regularly Associated with Accelerated Tumor Development in v-abl/myc-Induced Mouse Plasmacytomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromosome 11 aberrations constitute the second most frequent chromosomal aberration in mouse plasmacytomas (PCTs) in which both the myc and abl oncogenes are constitutively expressed. In these tumors, previous G-banding studies had revealed numerical aberrations including duplication of the entire chromosome 11 or segments of telomeric bands D and E. The trisomy of chromosome 11 was always associated with accelerated pristane + v-abl/myc-induced PCT development. In the present study, PCT development was studied in a unique BALB/c congenic mouse strain, (T38HxBALB/c) F1, carrying a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes X and 11. After v-abl/myc induction, PCTs in this strain had acquired a nonrandom duplication of subcytoband 11E2. This duplication was always associated with accelerated PCT development. Corresponding synteny regions in the human and rat are changed in many tumors and involved in duplication, amplification, or translocation events. Thus, together with these synteny data, our findings strongly suggest a causal involvement of 11E2 in the acceleration of v-abl/myc-induced PCTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".