MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096353844 · doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2218-9

High tibial osteotomy: evolution of research and clinical applications—a Canadian experience

2012· review· en· W2096353844 on OpenAlexaffabout
Iain McNamara, Trevor B. Birmingham, Peter J. Fowler, J. Robert Giffin

Bibliographic record

VenueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsFowler Kennedy Sport Medicine ClinicWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh tibial osteotomyMedicineValgusOsteotomySurgeryDeformityOsteoarthritisOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This narrative review describes experiences at the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic (FKSMC) with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for patients with varus gonarthrosis, with particular focus on research published from the unit that has guided practice. METHODS: The goals of surgery are to improve alignment of the weight bearing axis of the lower limb to lessen the load on the medial tibiofemoral compartment and thereby decrease these important risk factors for disease progression. The overall aims are to improve knee function and delay or even prevent the eventual need for arthroplasty. To achieve these aims, a medial opening wedge osteotomy is utilised, deliberately avoiding an over correction of the lower limb, but tailoring the angle of correction to an individual patient's characteristics. With such an approach, patients with a broad range of characteristics (including age, BMI and lateral compartment involvement) can benefit from the procedure. In addition, the HTO can be used with concomitant procedures to address specific presentations, such as large deformities and instability. RESULTS: The results suggest that correction to a slight valgus alignment produces approximately 50% reduction in medial compartment loads during gait with large, clinically important improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 2-years postoperatively. In patients with substantial bilateral varus deformity, unilateral surgery can lead to increased dynamic knee joint loads on the nonoperative limb after surgery. This means that such patients require the close monitoring of both limbs and consideration of a staged, bilateral procedure if necessary. In patients requiring bilateral surgery, similar results after bilateral HTO to those after unilateral surgery have been reported. For patients requiring large corrections, the need for a concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy to reduce the potential for iatrogenic patella infera is considered. Finally, HTO procedures can also be used in patients with instability, either to alter both sagittal and coronal alignment to correct instability in complex ligament deficiencies or to undertake simultaneous HTO and ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: HTO is being used both alone and in conjunction with concomitant procedures with good clinical results. While continued investigation into patient selection and outcomes are required, current research indicates that HTO offers at least a partial solution for the patient with varus gonarthrosis to prolong the life of their native knee joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology ArthroscopySame topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesFrench-language works237,207