<b>Initial Experience with a Low Profile, High Energy Excimer Laser Catheter for Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesion Debulking:</b> Parameters and Results of First Seven Human Case Experiences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) has not been used in the setting of highly calcified, tight stenoses because the energies required to use existing catheters would lead to excessive heat damage and dissection. There are, however, cases that frequently benefit from debulking prior to percutaneous intervention. A new, small laser catheter capable of high energies and repetition was previously examined in vitro. This study describes the first in vivo use. PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of a new, low profile, high energy laser catheter for creating a pilot hole to facilitate coronary angioplasty and stenting in patients with heavily calcified and occluded coronary arteries where a balloon has either failed to pass or was predicted to perform poorly. These patients represent the first patients treated with this new catheter. METHODS: At a high volume center, seven consecutive patients with anatomy as summarized above were treated and studied with QCA and then followed for 30 days postprocedure for complications and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class. RESULTS: The laser catheter crossed five out of seven lesions and partially penetrated the remaining lesions. The mean maximum luminal diameter (MLD) postlasing was 1.0 mm with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow. It was possible to easily balloon and stent after the pilot hole creation in all but one patient. TIMI 3 was achieved for the final result after adjunct therapy in all patients. All patients except one, who died at 3 months postprocedure of stroke, were improved by an average of two angina classes. No late procedural-related complications developed. CONCLUSIONS: The new, low profile laser catheter is easy to use and achieved good results in cases where a balloon either failed to pass or was predicted to give poor results. Further trials are warranted for this niche technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".