Utilization of raffinose and melibiose by a mutant of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 36858 was used in the production of ethanol and/or fructose from synthetic media in batch processes with raffinose, melibiose or sucrose. The mutant was able to hydrolyze all the sugars used and to selectively ferment glucose and galactose to ethanol while fructose accumulated in the fermentation medium. The fructose yield was above 89% of the theoretical value in the media with either raffinose or sucrose, when initial concentrations were between 131.5 g dm −3 and 242.0 g dm −3 . The ethanol yields were 82% and 77% of the theoretical values in the media with melibiose and sucrose, respectively, and about 72% of the theoretical value when raffinose was used. The fructose fraction in the carbohydrate content of the produced syrups was more than 96% when raffinose concentration was below 189.1 g dm −3 . However, even at a sucrose concentration of 187.9 g dm −3 , the produced syrup contained 100% fructose. Some oligosaccharides were also produced in all tested media. The produced oligosaccharides were consumed by the end of the fermentation process. These findings can be useful in the production of ethanol and high fructose syrups using raw materials based on sucrose and raffinose such as molasses. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".