K<sub>ATP</sub>channels depress force by reducing action potential amplitude in mouse EDL and soleus muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel openers depress force, channel blockers have no effect. Furthermore, the effects of channel openers on single action potentials are quite small. These facts raise questions as to whether 1) channel openers reduce force via an activation of KATP channels or via some nonspecific effects and 2) the reduction in force by KATP channels operates by changes in amplitude and duration of the action potential. To answer the first question we tested the hypothesis that pinacidil, a channel opener, does not affect force during fatigue in muscles of Kir6.2-/- mice that have no cell membrane KATP channel activity. When wild-type extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles were stimulated to fatigue with one tetanus per second, pinacidil increased the rate at which force decreased, prevented a rise in resting tension, and improved force recovery. Pinacidil had none of these effects in Kir6.2-/- muscles. To answer the second question, we tested the hypothesis that the effects of KATP channels on membrane excitability are greater during action potential trains than on single action potentials, especially during metabolic stress such as fatigue. During fatigue, M wave areas of control soleus remained constant for 90 s, suggesting no change in action potential amplitude for half of the fatigue period. In the presence of pinacidil, the decrease in M wave areas became significant within 30 s, during which time the rate of fatigue also became significantly faster compared with control muscles. It is therefore concluded that, once activated, KATP channels depress force and that this depression involves a reduction in action potential amplitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".