Bi/In as patterning and masking layers for alkaline-base Si anisotropic etching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new resist for alkaline-based silicon anisotropic etching process has been developed. Bismuth over Indium films, 30 nm to 90 nm thick for each layer, were DC-sputtered on silicon substrates, and were used as a thermally activated photoresist on which patterns were generated using focused Argon laser beam. Both physical and chemical properties of the bimetallic film changed after the laser exposure. Unlike normal organic photoresist, Bi/In is laser wavelength invariant as it is a thermal processes. The laser exposed patterns were developed in diluted RCA2 solution that selectively removed the unexposed area and retained the exposed. The developed Bi/In patterns acted as an etching mask for the subsequent alkaline-based silicon anisotropic etch at 85°C. It was found that the developed Bi/In has a lower etch rate than that of SiO2 in the etching solutions, making it a potential masking material for silicon bulk micromachining process. Solar cells with V-groove surface textures were manufactured to show the compatibility of Bi/In with conventional processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".