MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2096553148 · doi:10.1029/2003jd003742

Spatial statistics of marine boundary layer clouds

2004· article· en· W2096553148 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory Lewis, Philip H. Austin, Malgorzata Szczodrak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaFields Institute for Research in Mathematical SciencesOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotropyScalingPhysicsStatistical physicsScalar (mathematics)GeometryMathematicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis is presented of the structure functions and scalar spectra for 25 satellite‐derived marine stratocumulus cloud optical depth fields. The scenes, which cover a horizontal domain of 58 × 58 km at a resolution of 28.5 m, are partitioned into two ensembles on the basis of cloud fraction. For the fully cloudy scenes, although there is wide scene‐to‐scene variability, both the average isotropic scalar spectrum and the average isotropic second‐order structure function exhibit power law behavior over approximately two decades, with scale‐invariant exponents equal to those expected for inertial‐subrange passive tracer fluctuations. Higher‐order structure functions show anomalous scaling that closely matches that observed for wind tunnel temperature fluctuations and for other fully cloudy observations. The partly cloudy scenes, while scaling, show different behavior. The average isotropic second‐order structure function and average isotropic scalar spectrum have scale‐invariant exponents that are significantly smaller than those of the fully cloudy scenes, and the analysis of the higher‐order structure functions indicates that the field has much more intermittent fluctuations than the fully cloudy scenes. Fits to random cascade models for the fully cloudy scenes show that the increment statistics are consistent with an underlying log normal distribution. For the partly cloudy scenes a divergence of higher‐order moments is predicted, indicating that the field fluctuations are necessarily derived from fat‐tailed distributions and that there will be significant realization dependence of the measured statistics. In addition, the presence of long‐range correlations in all the data predicts that single‐point histograms of the field values will have significant scene‐to‐scene variability, or equivalently, the use of spatial averages in the approximation of the parameters of the single‐point probability density function of the field will result in random fluctuations of the estimated parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAeolian processes and effects→French-language works237,207→