MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096578607 · doi:10.1096/fj.14-252262

Structural basis of clade‐specific HIV‐1 neutralization by humanized anti‐V3 monoclonal antibody KD‐247

2014· article· en· W2096578607 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karen A. Kirby, Yee Tsuey Ong, Atsuko Hachiya, Thomas G. Laughlin, Leslie Chiang, Yun Pan, Jennifer L. Moran, Bruno Marchand, Kamalendra Singh, Fabio Gallazzi, Thomas P. Quinn, Kazuhisa Yoshimura, Toshio Murakami, Shuzo Matsushita, Stefan G. Sarafianos

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsV3 loopMonoclonal antibodyHypervariable regionAntibodyBiologyImmunoglobulin light chainAntigenChemistryMolecular biologyVirologyGeneticsEpitope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humanized monoclonal antibody KD‐247 targets the Gly 312 ‐Pro 313 ‐Gly 314 ‐Arg 315 arch of the third hypervariable (V3) loop of the HIV‐1 surface glycoprotein. It potently neutralizes many HIV‐1 clade B isolates, but not of other clades. To understand the molecular basis of this specificity, we solved a high‐resolution (1.55 Å) crystal structure of the KD‐247 antigen binding fragment and examined the potential interactions with various V3 loop targets. Unlike most antibodies, KD‐247 appears to interact with its target primarily through light chain residues. Several of these interactions involve Arg 315 of the V3 loop. To evaluate the role of light chain residues in the recognition of the V3 loop, we generated 20 variants of KD‐247 single‐chain variable fragments with mutations in the antigen‐binding site. Purified proteins were assessed for V3 loop binding using Alpha‐Screen technology and for HIV‐1 neutralization. Our data revealed that recognition of the clade‐specificity defining residue Arg 315 of the V3 loop is based on a network of interactions that involve Tyr L32 , Tyr L92 , and Asn L27d that directly interact with Arg 315 , thus elucidating the molecular interactions of KD‐247 with its V3 loop target—Kirby, K. A., Ong, Y. T., Hachiya, A., Laughlin, T. G., Chiang, L. A., Pan, Y., Moran, J. L., Marchand, B., Singh, K., Gallazzi, F., Quinn, T. P., Yoshimura, K., Murakami, T., Matsushita, S., Sarafianos, S. G., Structural basis of clade‐specific HIV‐1 neutralization by humanized anti‐V3 monoclonal antibody KD‐247. FASEB J. 29, 70–80 (2015). www.fasebj.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207